BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, March 9, 2005 ClubSport Fremont 46650 Landing Parkway Fremont, CA 94538 Directions: Driving South on 880, take the Mission Blvd/Warren Ave Exit. Continue on W. Warren and turn right on Landing Pkwy. Driving North on 880, take the Gateway Blvd Exit. Continue on Gateway Blvd and turn right on Bayside Pkwy. Bayside turns into Landing Pkwy I. Food and Beverage—6 PM II. Call to Order—6:30 PM III. Introduction of Guests IV. Public Comments-10 minutes, 2 minutes per speaker V. Approval of Minutes VI. Treasurer’s Report A. Monthly Financial Statements (Green) B. Monthly Grants (Red) VII. Committee Decisions/Reports (Yellow) VIII. Executive Committee Activities IX. Action Items (Blue) A. Change Order of Agenda and Require Written Reports B. Multicultural Participation Funding C. Review of Legal Counsel’s Contract D. Selection of Players for Limited Size Draws of Adult Tournaments X. President’s Report XI. Delegate’s Report XII. Executive Director’s Report XIII. Old Business XIV. New Business XV. Adjournment of Meeting Retreat Meeting: Sat., April 2, Fremont Marriott, 8 AM – 5 PM Next Regular Meeting: Wed., April 20 at ClubSport Fremont Mission: To Promote and Develop the Growth of Tennis Vision: 30 Million Tennis Players by 2010 Action Items March 2005 A Presenter(s): Marjorie Peterman, Mark Manning, Paul Kepler Statement of Action Item: 1. Change the order of the Agenda for Board Meetings to I – Food & Beverage II - Call to Order III – Introduction of Guests IV – Public Comments V – Approval of Minutes VI – Treasurer’s Report VII – Committee Decisions VIII – Executive Committee Actions IX – Action Items X – President’s Report XI – Executive Directors Report XII – Old Business XIII – New Business XIV - Adjourn 2. Require that the President’s Report, Executive Director’s Report and the Delegate’s Report be in writing and distributed to the Board in the Board packet prior to the meeting. Rationale for Action: Too many items of importance are left to the very end and not enough attention is given to adequately hear, comment and vote on them. Consequently some items are defeated without much input, while others are passed without much thought. If the President’s, ED’s and Delegate’s report are in writing and passed out prior to the meeting, they only need to go over the highlights and answer questions that the Board may have. Fiscal Impact: None Staff Comments: None March 2005 B Presenter(s): Paul Kepler, Mark Manning, Margie Peterman, Rosie Bareis Statement of Action Item: To require that all money allocated to “diversity” through the NorCal budget, grants/funding from USTA National, and/or from outside (non-USTA) donations/grants be directly applied to promote and develop the growth of “multicultural” tennis. Rationale for Action: To eliminate any confusion in the USTA Northern California Section regarding the priority of “multicultural” within the umbrella of “diversity”. Fiscal Impact: Unknown Staff Comments: At its Oct. 6, 2004 meeting, the USTA NorCal Multicultural Participation Committee unanimously adopted the USTA National Diversity Statement as follows: "We the United States Tennis Association recognize diversity as essential to achieving our mission, "To Promote and Develop the Growth of Tennis." For us, diversity refers to differences of culture, ethnicity, race, gender, beliefs, socio-economic status, sexual orientation, family status, physical ability, appearance and ideas. We acknowledge our goal is ambitions and challenging, but an opportunity we should clearly pursue. We are committed to achieving greater diversity throughout the sport and fostering a tennis environment that is more inclusive." March 2005 C Presenter(s): Paul Kepler, Margie Peterman, Rosie Bareis Statement of Action Item: To allow the proper review of the Section’s contract with Jim Drimmer by distributing the contract to all Board members at least one week prior to its next regularly scheduled meeting, discussing the contract in open session, and voting on its continuation (unchanged or as modified by the Board). Rationale for Action: Any contract 1 year or more requires Board approval. Such approval should only be granted after proper review and discussion. In the case of the Section’s legal counsel, such discussion should be held in open session. Fiscal Impact: Unknown Staff Comments: None March 2005 D Selection of Players for Limited Size Draws of Adult Tournaments Presenters: Andrea Norman, Mark Manning, Brian Cory, Don Jacobus Statement of Action Item: WHEREAS, on February 7, 2005 the Adult Tournament Committee passed the following resolution: “In a limited draw tournament, the tournament committee reserves the right to choose 25% of entries at their own discretion, but the remaining 75% must be selected randomly.”; and, WHEREAS, the resolution does not state whether a Tournament Committee’s right to choose 25% of the entries applies to the entire tournament or each draw; and WHEREAS, the resolution does not specify the effective date of the resolution. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: that, effective immediately, in a limited draw Adult Tournament, the Tournament Committee may select up to 25% of the entries of each draw at their own discretion and the remaining 75% of the entries shall be selected by lot. In the event the Tournament Committee selects fewer than 25% of the entries, all remaining entries shall be selected by lot. RESOLVED FURTHER: That this new rule become part of the 2005 Standard Adult Tournament Rules and such revised rules shall be published to the USTA NorCal Website; and RESOLVED FURTHER: That the Director of Adult Tournaments shall inform all tournament directors of 2005 Adult Tournaments with limited draws of the new rule and the immediate effective date; and RESOLVED FURTHER: That the Director of Adult Tournaments shall notify the USTA NorCal Officials Committee of the new rule and the immediate effective date and request that all USTA NorCal Referees be educated on the new rule and immediate effective date. Rational for Action: When the resolution relating to the selection of players for limited draws of Adult Tournaments was passed, it failed to include two important pieces of information: whether the discretion to choose 25% of the entries applied to the entire tournament, or each draw, and the effective date of the new rule. The Adult Tournament Committee is aware of this Action Item and has taken an online straw poll in support of it. Additionally, Bob Manalo and Jason Scalese are in favor of the Action Item. Fiscal Impact: None. Staff Comments: None |